Even the Ombudsman can't understand Barclays actions

I spent a while having a long chat the the financial ombudsman, who agreed that they had infact found in my favour. That the recommenddation was for both parties to negotiate... and then they said why are you contacting us..?

I then had to explain Barclays had used a silence to avoid my questions, used silence to not answer, used silence to disrupt our negotiations and had used silecne as asign of bad faith.... WHen I poitned out, it was them who had closed my account. It was them who must have known the outcome of their actions and so it stood to reason this was all a predatoryfirst strike. The Ombudsman's reply was epic, but we found in your favour...?

Again I had to relpy in simple terms, Barclays do not want to play by the rules.... The OMbudsman has now gone away to ask Barclays what they think they are going to achieve with this....